PEOPLES MOVEMENT

The big fight on the energy/climate bill is supposed to be whether the Senate can find 60 votes for, if not an economy-wide cap on carbon, then at least a utility-only (e.g., coal-fired electric power plants) cap on carbon.  Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), one of the flashier climate peacocks, says even that scaled back climate bill can’t find 60 votes to pass the Senate this year.

The real fight is not on the floor of the Senate, but at the Caucus Room restaurant in Washington, where electric utilities attempt to eviscerate the Clean Air Act: not just relating to greenhouse gases, but also well-known health hazards such as mercury and sulfur dioxide.

Politico has the story, and it’s not pretty: “The power companies want relief from the air pollution rules as a price of entry into negotiations if they are going to accept a mandatory carbon limit that won’t apply to other industries. The environmentalists are saying no.”  

And it’s not just relief from new EPA rules on greenhouse gases, but “a number of existing Clean Air Act programs dealing with sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury, including a new EPA rule proposed last week that deals with interstate pollution.”  Existing programs regarding criteria pollutants are supposed to be updated every so often, but weren’t during the Bush years (surprise!), so utilities are facing a huge backlog of work.  

The utility companies whine that avoiding the backlog is a necessary tradeoff if they’ll be the only sector subject to a cap on carbon.  They want relief on other pollutants.  Let’s be absolutely clear on the nature of that relief — it amounts to an extortion demand.  

The price of one baby step toward ensuring that carbon doesn’t make half the planet uninhabitable is the right to dump highly toxic mercury into America’s air, waterways, fish, and — ultimately —people.  And if they don’t get their way, they’ll oppose even the most modest climate bill.

David Roberts at Grist doesn’t mince words: Utilities are trying to pull off the scam of the decade.  If it goes through, “This deal really would do that: it would make the bill worse than nothing. It would be a step backward, on both climate and health grounds.” Update — Brad Plumer, at The New Republic, is equally harsh:Energy Bill Could Be a Disaster, if Utilities Get Their Way.

So far, environmentalists are standing firm in opposing the utilities’ demand.  Even Environmental Defense Fund, considered a pragmatic compromiser and in attendance at the back door meetings, signed on to a letter calling the utilities’ position “unacceptable.”

Elected leaders have stayed out of this to date.  Politico notes that Senate staff aren’t even in the room while these back door negotiations are taking place.  I’ve been pleasantly surprised by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s backbone in the last few weeks on climate-related issues.  I’d like to hear that he — or President Obama, or one of the Climate Peacocks — will just say no to the utilities’ extortion demand, and move ahead with a bill based on scientific reality.

VANCOUVER—A noisy search for oil should go ahead in the eastern Arctic’s Lancaster Sound despite objections the seismic tests will endanger sealife in the proposed marine park, a Nunavut review panel says.

The federal Geological Survey of Canada plans to use powerful blasts from underwater air guns, towed by a German research vessel, to look for oil and natural gas fields at the eastern entrance to the Northwest Passage this summer.

Part of the survey area is in Nunavut, whose government review board has turned aside objections from Inuit leaders and environmental groups and recommended the territory give the green light to the seismic tests.

Lined by magnificent cliffs up to 400 meters high, Lancaster Sound is a pristine waterway rich in marine life, including 30 species of fish. It is a summer home for most of the world’s narwhal and a third of North America’s belugas.

Endangered bowhead whales share the sound with walrus and ringed, bearded, and harp seals. Its shores are nesting grounds for roughly a third of eastern Canada’s seabird colonies.

Although the geological survey’s proposed seismic tests would use sounds waves, not drills, to detect oil under the seabed, Inuit hunters and southern environmentalists are worried that 600 hours of air gun blasts could put marine mammals at risk.

Fired at one-minute internals, the air gun shots could damage the sensitive hearing and sonar navigation of whales, belugas and other sea mammals, or disrupt their migratory patterns, Christopher Debicki, Nunavut projects director for the environmental group Oceans North, warned the review board.

But the panel dismissed those concerns, including unanimous opposition from Inuit mayors and hunters in hamlets near the proposed survey sites in Lancaster and Jones Sounds, and Baffin Bay.

The review board “strongly encouraged” Geological Survey of Canada officials to meet again with residents of the hamlets for consultations before the seismic tests go ahead.

“It appears that there has been a lack of coordination between Geological Survey of Canada and other federal government departments when designing and communicating this project proposal,” NIRB chair Lucassie Arragutainaq wrote in the board’s May 21 decision.

“Also, public concerns have been communicated regarding the lack of meaningful consultation with potentially affected communities and miscommunication regarding the late provision of project information during the screening process.”

The panel also suggested “that all air gun start-up procedures include a ‘soft start/ramping up” period’” and that the guns stay silent if marine mammals or colonies of seabirds are spotted within a “full 1,000 meter safety zone.”

Nunavut’s Environment Minister Daniel Shewchuk can either grant the geological survey a license to proceed or send the proposal back to the NIRB for further review. Shewchuk did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

The disaster unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, where BP’s deep sea well has been spewing plumes of crude for more than a month, has fueled fears that Arctic drilling could turn one of the last pristine places on Earth into a toxic wasteland.

Environment Minister Jim Prentice, who is also the minister responsible for Parks Canada, insists Ottawa will not allow a catastrophe like BP’s blowout off the southern U.S. coast to happen in the Canadian Arctic.

Finding out what resources lie beneath the seabed is just a normal step before Lancaster Sound can be protected as a National Marine Conservation Area, which would then be off bounds to oil and gas drilling, he said.

“I have no information to indicate that the seismic testing which is being contemplated would represent a threat to wildlife in any way, or to living life in the oceans,” he told the Star from Ottawa Wednesday. “There’s no indication of that.”

The Nahanni National Park Reserve, in the western Arctic’s Mackenzie Mountains, was expanded after a similar effort to map mineral and energy resources, Prentice added, insisting seismic tests won’t slow steps toward protecting Lancaster Sound as a marine park.

“I think, quite appropriately, we want to know the nature of the resources that are there for future planning, so that it’s clear to us,” Prentice said.

Drilling opponents warn that allowing rigs anywhere in Arctic waters would threaten the whole region. There is little disaster response equipment, or trained teams to use it, in the Arctic, one of the planet’s harshest, and most sensitive, environments.

Drifting oil slicks wouldn’t respect park boundaries, or international borders, and thick crude could foul vast stretches of sea ice, extremely fragile shorelines and wildlife migration routes for decades.

Despite mounting public anger over the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, U.S. President Barack Obama has refused to block Shell Oil’s plan to drill five exploratory wells in the Chukchi Sea and in the Beaufort Sea, off the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

“Certainly the Americans know our concerns and I think concern in the United States is obviously quite heightened as a result of what’s going in the Gulf also,” Prentice said.

More than 70 members of Congress signed a letter last week asking Obama to delay the drilling in waters bordering Canada’s western Arctic.

Other, potentially more serious drilling risks loom in the eastern Arctic, where Greenland has accepted bids from oil companies to sink deep sea wells this summer in Baffin Bay, near Lancaster Sound.

Prentice said he will have “extensive discussions” about the planned drilling in meetings with Greenland and Danish officials during a summit of June 9 summit of Arctic nations in Ilullissat, Greenland.